Advertisement


 

Last Update:
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:11 AM PST

News

CLASSIFIEDS

SPECIAL SECTIONS

Advertisement


Map the Valley


Subscriber/
Reader Services

Subscribe Now
Contact Customer Service

Selma Council votes against power plant

Although the project has yet to be given a green light, Selma's City Council has officially said no to a proposed power plant near Parlier. The City Council Feb. 17 voted unanimously against the location of the plant, which is slated to sit on the east side of Bethel Avenue between Dinuba and Manning avenues. The plant, proposed by the Kings River Conservation District, is a 565-megawatt natural gas base-load power plant that would sit on a 32-acre piece of land northeast of Selma. The conservation district's plan to open up the power plant near Parlier has been in the works for the last couple of years, beginning with its application to the state in September 2007.

Since then, the application for the project has and will continue to go through review from the California Energy Commission, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and the public.

But since its inception, the project has come under heavy criticism from Selma City Council members, as well as local and regional citizens, for what many say are potential dangers associated with the plant.

Some of these concerns include air pollution, noise and the fact that Selma's Indianola School sits within proximity to the proposed plant.

During their action at the Feb. 17 meeting, Selma City Council members officially went on record as opposing the location of the plant. Previously, members had only given consensus on the issue but hadn't voted on the matter.
Before the vote, Mayor Dennis Lujan offered his thoughts.

"That's pretty much a no-brainer," he said in regards to the resolution.

Still, that wasn't the only item of discussion that night.

Council members also talked at length about the city's membership with the San Joaquin Valley Power Authority, a coalition of regional cities which plan to buy aggregate power from the Kings River Conservation District.

At some point under this agreement, said Selma City Manager D-B Heusser, citizens will have the option to buy this power as well.

Heusser told Council members that the city of Selma has no financial interest in the power authority, nor does it have any financial commitment to the proposed power plant.

However, he noted, Selma's membership in the power authority means it's obligated to buy power under this program.

City documents indicate the authority's program promises to save its members 5 percent on their electrical bill, which would amount to savings of around $800 a year for the city.

Neal Costanzo, Selma's city attorney, discussed the city's membership in the organization and said Selma's only obligation is to procure power from the proposed plant. If Selma was to remain a member of the power authority, he said, it would be required to buy power regardless of where the plant was located.

Council member Ken Grey said that while he thinks the city's membership with the power authority could help save energy costs, he was opposed to committing to the power plant regardless of where it is located.

Mayor Lujan said he was opposed to the idea because he believes the plant would be a "gross polluter."

Council member Jim Avalos chimed in and said the power authority should be tapping into renewable energy sources, considering that the technology to do so is available.

"We're advanced now," said Avalos.

In the end, the Council unanimously decided to table the issue for two weeks, in order for the city attorney to gather the city's terms of agreement with the power authority for Council members to examine.

Still others spoke during the meeting, like local resident Scott Linhoff.

Linhoff has two boys, one who currently goes to Indianola Elementary and another who will be attending next year.

For his part, Linhoff said he's against the proposed power plant's location because of potential health costs to his children, noise and what he sees as possible land devaluation for property near the plant.

"It just needs to be stopped," he said.

Scott Bailey, district manager for California Water Service in Selma, also spoke and brought up another point about the proposed plant.

"Every power plant that has been built in the state of California has had water litigation because of the contaminants from the power plants," he said.

In other action:

l The council unanimously approved to purchase two signs for the city which read "In God We Trust" for a total of $600. The first sign will be placed in the city hall lobby and the second will be placed in the chamber.

l The Council was introduced to Selma's newest firefighter and paramedic, resident Scott Nishinaka.

POST A COMMENT

 

Selmaenterprise.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted are not posted to the site immediately. They go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed, particularly if they are posted after normal office hours.

We reserve the right to remove comments in total that violate our code of conduct. We will not post reader comments containing racial, religious or personal attacks, slander, profanity, or commercial product promotions.

For more information please read our Terms of use, and Rules of the Road.

 

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

Discouraged wrote on Feb 25, 2009 8:54 PM:

" I have been in Selma five years now and I have yet to see anything good or encouraging come from our city council. Do they ever do anything that actually benefits this city? You would think that in the financial state we are in, the council would not even consider waiving any fee whatsoever to anyone. Now, city employees have to pay for the ignorance of our council and city managers by lay-offs and furlough days off. "

Freedom of speach wrote on Feb 28, 2009 9:42 PM:

" I wish more citizens would show up at our city council meetings and challenge the ignorance that spews out of the talking heads that take up space on our city council. You are so predictable! I know you read these blogs and it burns your tails when you read the posts. I can assure you that those that are blogging are doins so because they see problems with what is going on in our great city. The reason more folks don't show up at our city council meetings to express themselves is because we don't want to be retaliated against for speaking our minds. Blogging is much safer and the message stills gets out regardless of whether you know or don't know the person blogging. Thanks for reading, hope it causes you to think! "

Scott Linhoff wrote on Mar 4, 2009 11:47 AM:

" Kudos to the City Council for voting unanimously against the KRCD proposed power plant. Kudos to them again for removing the City of Selma from the so called "Community Choice" group! Being part of that group meant the city would have had to buy power from that power plant. That would have opened the city up to be named in all kinds of law suits. Every power plant in California built like the one that's being proposed for Selma has been subject to litigation because of ground water contamination. Next, I'd love to Kudo's the Selma Unified School Board for voting unanimously against a nasty polluting power plant proposed to be built within a 1/4 to 1 mile of 1400 of their school kids. Regardless of what "Discouraged" and "Freedom of Speech" wrote I say to the Selma City Council, keep up the good work!

Sincerely,

Concerned Indianola Parent "

Elizabeth Thornhill wrote on Mar 10, 2009 3:06 PM:

" I don't agree with the council. I think that we should look into the matter. These plants are much cleaner burning than they used to be. I think that this is something the people of Selma should vote on. I don't want the liberals on the city council speaking for me. What I do know is that Selma needs the jobs, maybe the city council will give up theirs? "



LOCAL VIDEO


Advertisement


MORE LOCAL NEWS

Lemoore:

    Hanford:

    Kingsburg:




    EMAIL UPDATES

    Sign up today to get breaking news delivered to your home or work e-mail address.
    E-Mail: